ISSUE: 1/2025
- Volume 29
- Number 1
- 2025
Subscribe NEWSLETTER
Studia Europejskie –
Studies in European Affairs
ISSN: 1428-149X
e-ISSN: 2719-3780
License
Articles published in the journal are under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivatives 4.0 International License
Publication co-financed by Ministry of Science and Higher Education pursuant to the Regulation of the Minister of Education and Science of 3 August 2021 (Journal of Laws of 2021, item 1514) on the “Development of Scientific Journals” programme.
Publikacja dofinansowana przez Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego na podstawie rozporządzenia Ministra Edukacji i Nauki z 3 sierpnia 2021 r. (Dz. U. z 2021 r. poz. 1514) w sprawie programu „Rozwój czasopism naukowych”.
Publication co-financed by the University of Warsaw within the “Excellence Initiative – Research University” programme.
Czasopismo otrzymało dofinasowanie w ramach Programu „Inicjatywa Doskonałości – Uczelnia Badawcza”.
The Idea of the European Union as a Cosmopolitan Empire: A Critical Assessment
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to submit the concept of the European Union as a “cosmopolitan empire”, proposed by Ulrich Beck and Edgar Grande (2007), to a critical discussion. As it attempts to grasp this concept in its practical rather than its theoretical form, it discusses the “ideal” of a European cosmopolitan empire in relation to the criteria of excellence and coherence. Compared to abstract universalism and to national relativism, the cosmopolitan ideal can be seen as a higher synthesis, since it transcends the dilemma between the effacement or the essentialisation of cultural differences. However, this synthesis, when translated into practice, reveals certain ambiguities that undermine its feasibility. The concept of a “cosmopolitan empire” emerges as a proposed solution, with European identity being reframed through the lens of cosmopolitanisation or transnationalisation. This perspective entails a profound openness and inclusion of the so-called “others”. An empire is supposed to be a political structure capable of incorporating differences within a transnational framework of governance. However, this concept sits uneasily with the historically-embedded meanings of European imperial practice which are better captured through the concept of a “neo-medieval empire” as proposed by Jan Zielonka (2007). The civilising mission, a historically prominent imperial function, relies on a fundamental dichotomy between the intrinsically necessary status of imperial polity and the contingent status of rival polities. If the cosmopolitan ideal, which seeks to transcend the distinction between “us” and the “others”, is embodied within such a mission, it risks producing a heterogeneous international society that is surreptitiously perceived as being homogeneous. This incoherence would hinder the recognition of the validity and the reality of divergent value systems and the concept of a cosmopolitan empire would thereby fail in its ambition to regulate the anomic conflicts characteristic of a “second modernity”.
References
Anscombe, G.E.M (2000) Intention. Harvard.
Aron, R. (1967) Peace and War. Praeger.
Beck, U. and Grande, E. (2007) Cosmopolitan Europe. Polity Press.
Beck, U. and Camiller, P. (2004) “The Truth of Others: A Cosmopolitan Approach”, Common Knowledge. Vol. 10(3), pp. 430–449. DOI: 10.1215/0961754X-10-3-430.
Beck, U. and Camiller, P. (2005) “Neither Order nor Peace: A Response to Bruno Latour”, Common Knowledge. Vol. 11(1), pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1215/0961754X-11-1-1.
Beck, U. (2006) Cosmopolitan Vision. Polity Press.
Beck, U. and Delanty, G. (2017) Europe from a cosmopolitan perspective in Delanty, G. (ed.) Europe and Asia Beyond East and West. Routledge. Available at: https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9781134181414_A23771905/preview-9781134181414_A23771905.pdf (Access 10.12.2024).
Beck, U. and Grande, E. (2010) Empire Europe: Statehood and Political Authority in the Process of Regional Integration in Neyer, J. and Wiener, A. (eds.) Political Theory of the European Union, Oxford University Press.
Beck, U. and Levy, D. (2013) “Cosmopolitanized Nations: Re-imagining Collectivity in World Risk Society”, Theory, Culture & Society. Vol. 30(2), pp. 3–31. DOI: 10.1177/0263276412457223.
Best, U. (2015) “Raum- und Europakonzepte in Imperialismus-theorien”. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies. Vol. 7(3), pp. 457–481. DOI: 10.14288/acme.v7i3.815.
Böröcz, J. and Sarkar, M. (2005) “What Is the EU?”, International Sociology. Vol. 20(2), pp. 153–173. DOI 10.1177/0268580905052367.
Burbank, J. and Cooper, F. (2010) Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference, Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400834709.
Calmette, J. (1966) Charlemagne. Paris: PUF.
Eisenstadt, S. (1963) The political systems of Empires, Macmillan.
Folz, R. (1978) L’interprétation de l’empire ottonien in Actes des congrès de la Société des historiens médiévistes de l’enseignement supérieur public, 9-congrès. Dijon: Occident et Orient au Xe siècle. pp. 5–22. DOI: 10.3406/shmes.1978.1269.
Fustel de Coulanges, N.D. (2009) La cité antique. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511697753.
Gehler, M. (2019) “The European Union: A Post-Democratic, Post-Modern, and Post-National Empire?”, Journal of European Integration History, pp. 235–268. DOI: 10.5771/0947-9511-2018-2-235.
Ghervas, S. (2014) Antidotes to Empire: From the Congress System to the European Union in Boyer W.J. and Molden B. (eds.) EUtROPEs, The Paradox of European Empire. Chicago University Press.
Gierke, O. (2013) Political Theories of the Middle Age. Cambridge University Press.
Gravier, M. (2011) “Empire vs federation: which path for Europe?”, Journal of Political Power. Vol. 4(3), pp. 413–431. DOI: 10.1080/2158379X.2011.628854.
Kissinger, H. (2014) World Order. Penguin.
Latour, B. (2004) “Whose cosmos, which cosmopolitics? Comments on the Peace Terms of Ulrich Beck”, Common Knowledge. Vol. 10(3). DOI: 10.1215/0961754X-10-3-450.
Le Goff, J. (2003) L’Europe, est-elle née au Moyen Âge? Paris: Seuil.
MacIntyre, A. (1981) After Virtue, A Study in Moral Theory. University of Notre Dame Press.
MacIntyre, A. (1990) Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry, Encyclopaedia, Genealogy, and Tradition. University of Notre Dame Press.
Maine, H. (1920) Ancient Law. London: John Murray.
Marinopoulou, A. (2009) “Book Review of Cosmopolitan Europe”, Philosophical Inquiry. Vol. 31(3–4), pp. 153–156.
Pänke, J. (2019) “Liberal Empire, Geopolitics and EU Strategy: Norms and Interests in European Foreign Policy Making”, Geopolitics, Vol. 24(1), pp. 100–123. DOI 10.1080/14650045.2018.1528545.
Papaligouras, P. (1941) Théorie de la Société Internationale. Genève.
Schmitt, C. (2006) The «Nomos» of the Earth, in the International Law of the «Jus Publicum Europaeum». Telos Press Publishing.
Šejvl, M. (2019) “European Identity in Times of Crises”. Studia Europejskie – Studies in European Affairs. Vol. 23(1), pp. 13–26. DOI: 10.33067/SE.1.2019.01.
Spruyt, H. (1994) The Sovereign State and Its Competitors, An analysis of System Change. Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780691213057.
Todorov, T. (2008) La peur des barbares. Paris: Robert Laffont.
Todorov, T. (1985) The conquest of America [1982]. New York: Harper.
Toynbee, A. (1950) War and Civilization. Oxford University Press.
Ullmann, W. (2010) The Carolingian Renaissance and the Idea of Kingship. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203855669.
Voegelin, E. (1962) “World-Empire and the Unity of Mankind”, International Affairs. Vol. 38(2), pp. 170–188. DOI: 10.2307/2610376.
Voegelin, E. (1966) The New Science of Politics: An introductory Essay. University of Chicago Press.
Wolff, L.-A. (2020) “Sustainability Education in Risks and Crises: Lessons from Covid-19”, Sustainability. Vol. 12(12), pp. 5205. DOI: 10.3390/su12125205.
Zielonka, J. (2000) Enlargement and the Finality of European Integration in Joerges, Ch., Mény, Y. and Weiler, J.H.H. (eds.), What Kind of Constitution for What Kind of Polity? –Responses to Joschka Fischer. The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies at the European University Institute.
Zielonka, J. (2007) Europe as Empire. The Nature of the Enlarged European Union. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/0199292213.001.0001.
Zielonka J. (2013a) “The International System in Europe: Westphalian Anarchy or Medieval Chaos?”, Journal of European Integration. Vol. 35(1), pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2011.652626.
Zielonka, J. (2013b) “Europe’s new civilizing missions: the EU’s normative power discourse”, Journal of Political Ideologies. Vol. 18(1), pp. 35–55. DOI: 10.1080/13569317.2013.750172.
DOI: 10.33067/SE.1.2025.4
Language: English
Pages: 55-69
How to Cite:
Harvard
Rozakis, D. (2025) "The Idea of the European Union as a Cosmopolitan Empire: A Critical Assessment". Studia Europejskie – Studies in European Affairs, 1/2025, pp. 55-69. DOI: 10.33067/SE.1.2025.4