ISSUE: 2/2024

  • Volume 28
  • Number 2
  • 2024

Subscribe NEWSLETTER

Studia Europejskie –
Studies in European Affairs

ISSN: 1428-149X
e-ISSN: 2719-3780

Ccbync License

License

Articles published in the journal are under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivatives 4.0 International License

The EU as a Global Actor: The Significance of Changes in the World Order From 2004 to 2024 as Regards EU Actorness

Abstract

Contrary to the prevalent focus on the EU’s capabilities, this article analyses the implications for the EU’s global actorness stemming from changes in the world order. These changes are elaborated upon according to Hettne’s (2005) three-dimensional analysis of the world order, namely, its structure, mode of governance, and form of legitimisation from 2004 when the CEE countries became EU members, to 20 years into their membership in 2024. The main changes of the world order are identified as: the evolving multipolar international system; a transition from multilateralism towards plurilateralism; and the sporadic unilateral actions and delegitimisation of liberal world order alongside instances of the major powers’ disregard of international law. The article then elucidates the impact of these changes on EU actorness via illustrative case studies of issues dealt within the UN system and the WTO, namely, international trade, sustainable development, climate change, and international peace and security. Findings show that firstly, in an evolving multipolar international system, the EU aligns strongly with the US which maintains central power in security issues. Secondly, all case studies prove that the EU remains committed to transparent multilateralism. Thirdly, despite instances of increasing state-level disrespect of international law by the US, Russia, and China, the EU’s resolve and advocacy for international norms remains stable. The EU has managed to leverage its economic and normative capabilities along with its positive presence to exert legitimate leadership in, for example, digital trade agenda, the green transition, and artificial intelligence, but not in enlargement policy. And yet, the war in Ukraine has prompted the Union to bolster its military capability and upgrade its geopolitical strategy towards its neighbours. The authors conclude that the potential development of the EU’s defensive security capability – provided it is developed complementary to its unique market and normative power – offers an opportunity for the EU to reduce its capabilities/expectations gap and enhance its global actorness.

References

Ahnlid, A. (2005) The European Union and the launch of the Doha Round in Elgström, O. and Jönsson, C. (eds.) European Union Negotiations: processes, networks and institutions, Routledge, pp. 130–133.

Bergner, S. (2023) “The role of the European Union in global health: The EU’s self-perception(s) within the COVID-19 pandemic”, Health Policy. Vol. 127, pp. 5–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.10.006.

Bojinović Fenko, A. and Kočan, F. (2023) Central and Eastern European countries’ foreign policy responses to the rise of illiberalism in international politics in Hočevar, M., Rutar, T. and Lovec, M. (eds.) The neoliberal world order in crisis, and beyond: an East European perspective. Ljubljana: Faculty of Social Sciences.

Bretherton, C. and Vogler, J. (1999) The European Union as a Global Actor. Routledge.

Cosgrove, C.A. and Twitchett, K.J. (eds.) (1970) The new international actors. The United Nations and the European Economic Community. Macmillan, New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Crnčec, D., Požgan, J. and Bojinović Fenko, A. (2024) Protection of the global climate in EU–Russia relations: An assessment of norm strength and logic of action in Dyrhauge, H. and Kurze, K. (eds.) Making the European Green Deal Work: EU Sustainability Policies at Home. Routledge.

Drieskens, E. (2021) Actorness and the study of the EU’s external action in Gstohl, S. and Schunz, S. (eds.) The External Action of the European Union – Concepts, Approaches, Theories. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

EU AI Act (2024) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts, endorsed in April 2024. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CONSIL%3AST_7536_2024_INIT&qid=1714154566903 (Access 30.04.2024).

European Council (2003) European Security Strategy. Available at: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-15895-2003-INIT/en/pdf (Access 30.04.2024).

Fahey, E. and Brsakoska Bazerkoska, J. (2022) Critical Perspectives on Social and Legal Relevance of Sincere cooperation in EU External Relations Law in the Era of Expanding Trade: the Belt and Road Initiative in Context in Levrat, N., Kaspiarovich, Y., Kaddous, C. and Wessel, R.A. (eds.) EU and its Member States’ Joint Participation in International Agreements. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Grabbe, H. and Hughes, K. (1998) Enlarging the EU Eastwards. London: Pinter for the Royal Institute of International Affairs.

Hettne, B. (1999) Globalization and the New Regionalism: The Second Great Transformation in Hettne, B., Inotai, A. and Sunkel, O. (eds.) Globalism

and the New Regionalism. The New Regionalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hettne, B. (2005) “Beyond the «new» regionalism”, New Political Economy. Vol. 10(4), pp. 543–571. DOI: 10.1080/13563460500344484.

Hettne, B. (2011) The European Union as an emerging global actor in Wunderlich, J. and Bailey, D.J. (eds.) The European Union and Global Governance: A Handbook. Routledge.

Hettne, B. and Söderbaum, F. (2005) “Civilian Power or Soft Imperialism? EU as a Global Actor and the Role of Interregionalism”, European Foreign Affairs Review. Vol. 10(4), pp. 535–552.

Hill, C. (1993) “The Capability-Expectations Gap, or Conceptualizing Europe’s International Role”, Journal Common Market Studies. Vol. 31(3), pp. 305–328. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.1993.tb00466.x.

Ismayilov, E. (2021) Russia’s military interventions in Georgia and Ukraine: interests, motives, and decision-making. Academica Press. Available at: https://www.academicapress.com/node/479 (Access 30.04.2024).

Jørgensen, K.E. and Wessel, R.A. (2011) The position of the European Union in (other) international organizations: confronting legal and political approaches in Koutrakos, P. (ed.) European Foreign Policy – Legal and Political Perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Jupille, J. and Caporaso, J.A. (1998) States, agency and rules: The European Union in global environmental politics in Rhodes, C. (ed.) The European Union in the World Community. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Kamphof, R. (2019) UN Environment Programme (UN Environment) and UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) – EU action between legal competences and political power in Wessel, R.A. and Odermatt, J. (eds.) European Union and International Organizations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Kelemen, R.D. (2010) “Globalizing European Union environmental policy”, Journal of European Public Policy. Vol. 17(3), pp. 335–349.

Kerr, W.A. (2020) “Aggressive Unilateralism – The New Focus of US Trade Policy”, Journal of International Law and Trade Policy. Vol. 21(1), pp. 1–17.

Keukeleire, S. and Delereux, T. (2008) The foreign policy of the European Union. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kozyrev, V. (2024) The War in Ukraine and Its Impact on the US Perspective of Europe in Biba, S. (ed.) Europe in an Era of US-China Strategic Rivalry; Challenges and Opportunities from an Outside-in Perspective. Springer.

Mannin, M. (ed.) (1999) Pushing Back the Boundaries: the EU and Central and Eastern Europe. Manchester University Press.

Medrano, J.D. (1999) The European Union: economic giant, political dwarf in Paul, T.V. and Hall, J.A. (eds.) International Order and the Future of World Politics. Cambridge University Press.

Mortensen, J.L. (2009) The World Trade Organization and the European Union in Jorgensen, K.E. (ed.) The European Union and International Organisations. Routledge.

Pajtinka, E. (2020) “The beginnings of the European Diplomatic Service From the 1950s to the 1980s”, Teorija in Praksa. Vol. 57(2), pp. 455–470.

Participation of the European Union in the work of the United Nations (2011) Resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly, no. A/RES/65/276, on 10 May 2011.

Peterson, J. (2004) “Europe, America, Iraq: Worst ever, ever worsening?”, Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 42(1), pp. 9–26. DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-9886.2004.00498.x.

Peterson, J. and Sjursen, H. (eds.) (1999) A common foreign policy for Europe?: competing visions of the CFSP. Routledge.

Perišin, T. (2019) World Trade Organization (WTO) – The EU’s influential role in global trade policy in Wessel, R.A. and Odermatt, J. (eds.) European Union and International Organizations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Political Declaration (2019) Political Declaration setting out the framework for the future relationship between the European Union and the United Kingdom. OJ 2019, C 384 I/178 of 12.11.2019.

Portela, C. (2021) Conceptualizing coherence in EU external action in Gstohl, S. and Schunz, S. (eds.) The External Action of the European Union – Concepts, Approaches, Theories. Bloomsbury Academic.

Schimmelfennig, F. and Sedelmeier, U. (2004) “Governance by Conditionality: EU Rule Transfer to the Candidate Countries of Central and Eastern Europe”, Journal of European Public Policy. Vol. 11(4), pp. 661–679.

Schimmelfennig, F. and Winzen, T. (2017) “Eastern enlargement and differentiated integration: Towards normalization”, Journal of European Public Policy. Vol. 24(2), p. 239. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1264083.

Smith, K. (2003) European Union Foreign Policy in a Changing World. Polity Press.

Smith, M.E. (2004) Europe’s Foreign and Security Policy. The Institutionalization of Cooperation. Cambridge University Press.

Sjöstedt, G. (1977) The external role of the European Community. Saxon House.

Van Vooren, B. (2011) The European Union as an international actor and progressive experimentation in its neighbourhood in Koutrakos, P. (ed.) European Foreign Policy – Legal and Political Perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Van Vooren, B. and Wessel, R.A. (2018) EU External Relations Law – Text, Cases and Materials. Cambridge University Press.

Vangeli, A. (2020) “Belt and Road and China’s Attempt at Region Building in Central-East and Southeast Europe”, Journal of Current Chinese Affairs. Vol. 49(1), pp. 14–32. DOI: 10.1177/1868102620953439.

Vogler, J. and Bretherton, C. (2006) “The European Union as a protagonist to the United States on climate change”, International Studies Perspectives. Vol. 7(1), pp. 1–22.

WTO (2024) Disputes by member. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_by_country_e.htm (Access 30.04.2024).

Wunderlich, J.U. and Bailey, J.D. (eds.) (2011) The European Union and Global Governance: A Handbook. Routledge.

Zhao, C. (2024) Russia and the War in Ukraine: The Chinese Perspective on Europe’s Role in Biba, S. (ed.) Europe in an Era of US-China Strategic Rivalry; Challenges and Opportunities from an Outside-in Perspective. Springer.

Language: English

Pages: 7-26

How to Cite:

Harvard

Bojinović Fenko, A. and Brsakoska-Bazerkoska, J. (2024) "The EU as a Global Actor: The Significance of Changes in the World Order From 2004 to 2024 as Regards EU Actorness". Studia Europejskie – Studies in European Affairs, 2/2024, pp. 7-26. DOI: 10.33067/SE.2.2024.1

APA
Chicago