ISSUE: 1/2026
- Volume 30
- Number 1
- 2026
Subscribe NEWSLETTER
Studia Europejskie –
Studies in European Affairs
ISSN: 1428-149X
e-ISSN: 2719-3780
License
Articles published in the journal are under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivatives 4.0 International License
Publication co-financed by Ministry of Science and Higher Education pursuant to the Regulation of the Minister of Education and Science of 3 August 2021 (Journal of Laws of 2021, item 1514) on the “Development of Scientific Journals” programme.
Publikacja dofinansowana przez Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego na podstawie rozporządzenia Ministra Edukacji i Nauki z 3 sierpnia 2021 r. (Dz. U. z 2021 r. poz. 1514) w sprawie programu „Rozwój czasopism naukowych”.
Publication co-financed by the University of Warsaw within the “Excellence Initiative – Research University” programme.
Czasopismo otrzymało dofinasowanie w ramach Programu „Inicjatywa Doskonałości – Uczelnia Badawcza”.
The Energy Transition, a Place-Based Approach, and Spatial Justice
Abstract
As energy systems in Europe have changed over the years, so too have the underlying economies, jobs and patterns of land-use. In turn, these changes present a multitude of challenges for supporting an energy system that is equitable, socially sustainable and which provides access to all. This paper explores the connection between place-based methodologies for developing energy supply chains and the notion of a “just transition”, and considers how European regions can achieve climate neutrality while enhancing the development of their economies, societies, and territories. The research integrates place-based development theory with spatial justice and just transition perspectives that are relevant to energy transition governance. By linking these approaches, the study provides a foundation for designing interventions that are grounded in local environmental, socio-economic, and institutional conditions, while the concept of spatial justice facilitates the analysis of the ethical and distributive impacts of uneven regional development. Empirically, the study is based on a comparative analysis of three European transition regions – namely, Western Macedonia (Greece), Silesia (Poland), and Stara Zagora (Bulgaria), conducted within the JT-OBSERVATORY project. The methodology combines qualitative fieldwork, including semistructured interviews, questionnaires, and co-creation workshops, with participatory modelling techniques, notably Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM), across the three case studies. These data were complemented by regional socio-economic indicators and spatial analysis, enabling triangulation between governance structures, stakeholder perceptions, and territorial outcomes. The findings reveal persistent deficits in procedural, distributive, and recognition justice across all three regions, expressed through distinct governance configurations. Centralised decision-making, limited earlystage participation, and weak feedback mechanisms undermine trust and social acceptance of transition policies, This paper argues that integrating territorial sensitivity with justice principles strengthens the legitimacy, effectiveness, and resilience of transition strategies. Such an approach enables the energy transition to function not only as an environmental imperative but also as an opportunity to advance a more cohesive and equitable European development model.
References
Bäckstrand, K. (2003) “Civic science for sustainability”, Global Environmental Politics. Vol. 3(4), pp. 24–41. DOI: 10.1162/152638003322757916.
Barca, F. (2009) An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Brussels: EERI.
Barca, F., McCann, P. and Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012) “The case for regional development intervention: place-based versus place-neutral approaches”, Journal of Regional Science. Vol. 52(1), pp. 134–152. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x.
El-Taliawi, O. and Van Der Wal, Z. (2019) “Developing administrative capacity”, Public Administration and Development. Vol. 39(1), pp. 17–27.
Fainstein, S. (2014) “The just city”, International Journal of Urban Sciences. Vol. 18(1), pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2013.834643.
Fouquet, R. and Pearson, P. (2012) “Past and prospective energy transitions”, Energy Policy. Vol. 50, pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.014.
Geels, F.W. (2002) “Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study”, Research Policy. Vol. 31(8–9), pp. 1257–1274. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
Geels, F.W. (2011) “The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms”, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. Vol. 1(1), pp. 24–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002.
Geels, F.W. (2014) “Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective”, Theory, Culture & Society. Vol. 31(5), pp. 21–40. DOI: 10.1177/0263276414531627.
Giannakopoulos, D., Karagiannis, I. and Topaloglou, L. (2022) “Monitoring and assessment mechanism of just energy transition trajectories”, Journal of Energy Technology. Vol. 15(4), pp. 29–49. DOI: 10.18690/jet.15.4.29-50.2022.
Höhne, N. et al. (2020) “Emissions: world has four times the work”, Nature. No. 579, pp. 25–28. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-020-00571-x.
Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2001) Multi-level governance and European integration. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. DOI: 10.5040/9798216401537.
Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2010) The rise of regional authority. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203852170.
Iammarino, S., Rodríguez-Pose, A. and Storper, M. (2017) “Why regional development matters”, EU DG Regio Working Paper. Vol. 7.
Irwin, A. (2006) “The politics of talk”, Social Studies of Science. Vol. 36(2), pp. 299–320. DOI: 10.1177/0306312706053350.
Iveson, K. (2011) “Social justice and the city”, Antipode. Vol. 43(5), pp. 1693–1700.
Jakob, M. (2025) The case against climate doom: An economist’s guide to climate optimism. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-93968-6.
Jenkins, K.E.H., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H. and Rehner, R. (2016) “Energy justice: A conceptual review”, Energy Research & Social Science. No. 11, pp. 174–182. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004.
Lennon, B., Dunphy, N. and Sanvicente, E. (2019) “Community acceptability and the energy transition”, Energy, Sustainability and Society. Vol. 9(1), pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.1186/s13705-019-0218-z.
Loorbach, D. (2007) Transition management. Maastricht: ICIS.
Mansbridge, J. et al. (2012) “A systemic approach to deliberative democracy”, Political Theory. Vol. 40(1), pp. 1–29. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139178914.002.
Marcuse, P. (2010) Spatial justice: derivative but necessary in Bret, B. et al. (eds.) Justice et injustices spatiales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Paris Nanterre. DOI: 10.4000/books.pupo.420.
McCauley, D. and Heffron, R. (2018) “Just transition: Integrating climate, energy and environmental justice”, Energy Policy. Vol. 119, pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.014.
McCauley, D. et al. (2019) “Energy justice revisited”, Applied Energy. No. 233, pp. 916–921. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.005.
Mendez, C. and Bachtler, J. (2024) “Quality of government and administrative performance”, Regional Studies. Vol. 58(4), pp. 690–703. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2022.2083593.
Miranda, M. et al. (2011) “Making the environmental justice grade”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Vol. 8(6), pp. 1755–1771. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph8061755.
Newell, P. and Mulvaney, D. (2013) “The political economy of the «just transition»”, The Geographical Journal. Vol. 179(2), pp. 132–140. DOI: 10.1111/geoj.12008.
Nowakowska, A., Rzeńca, A. and Sobol, A. (2021) “Place-based policy in the «just transition» process”, Land. Vol. 10(10), 1072. DOI: 10.3390/land10101072.
Radtke, J. and Renn, O. (2024) “Participation in energy transitions: a comparison of policy styles”, Energy Research & Social Science. No. 118, 103743. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103743.
Rotmans, J., Kemp, R. and Van Asselt, M. (2001) “More evolution than revolution”, Foresight. Vol. 3(1), pp. 15–31. DOI: 10.1108/14636680110803003.
Rudolph, D. (2023) “The question of «sustainable» technology: From socio-ecological fixes to transformations”, Human Geography. Vol. 16(1), Article 19427786221119401. DOI: 10.1177/19427786221119401.
Renn, O. and Schweizer, P. (2020) “Inclusive governance for energy transitions”, Energy Research & Social Science. No. 70, pp. 101–676.
Soja, E. (2010) Seeking Spatial Justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. DOI: 10.5749/minnesota/9780816666676.001.0001.
Solomon, B. and Krishna, K. (2011) “The coming sustainable energy transition”, Energy Policy. Vol. 39(11), pp. 7422–7431. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.009.
Staber, U. (2007) “Contextualizing research on social capital”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. Vol. 31(3), pp. 505–521. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00742.x.
Stimson, R., Stough, R. and Roberts, B. (2006) Regional Economic Development. Berlin: Springer.
Suboticki, I., Heidenreich, S., Ryghaug, M. and Skjølsvold, T.M. (2023) “Fostering justice through engagement: A literature review of public engagement in energy transitions”, Energy Research & Social Science. No. 99, 103053. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103053.
Szulecki, K. and Overland, I. (2020) “Energy democracy as a process, an outcome and a goal: A conceptual review”, Energy Research & Social Science. No. 69, 101768. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101768.
Tollefson, J. (2019) “The hard truths of climate change”, Nature. No. 573, pp. 324–327. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-02711-4.
Wironen, M.B., Bartlett, R.V. and Erickson, J.D. (2019) Deliberation and the promise of a deeply democratic sustainability transition, Sustainability. Vol. 11(4), p. 1023. DOI: 10.3390/su11041023.
Language: English
Pages: 211-227
How to Cite:
Harvard
Kanteler, D. (2026) "The Energy Transition, a Place-Based Approach, and Spatial Justice". Studia Europejskie – Studies in European Affairs, 1/2026, pp. 211-227. DOI: 10.33067/SE.1.2026.12