ISSUE: 4/2019

  • Volume 23
  • Number 4
  • 2019

Subscribe NEWSLETTER

Studia Europejskie –
Studies in European Affairs

ISSN: 1428-149X
e-ISSN: 2719-3780

Ccbync License

License

Articles published in the journal are under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivatives 4.0 International License

The End of Transatlanticism? EU Security and Defence Policies and the ‘Strategic Autonomy’ Debate from a Historical and Contemporary Perspective

Abstract

This article examines whether calls for European ‘strategic autonomy’ in response to Trump’s rhetoric are qualitatively different from earlier disagreements in US-EU relations. By doing so, it re-assesses Geir Lundestad’s concept of “Empire by Invitation” to illustrate constraints for the development of such an autonomy especially in defence affairs. We argue that the US’s involvement in European defence affairs was never an invitation to ‘empire’, as the invitational aspect was based on consent. A process has been accelerated by the Trump presidency whereby this consent has shifted towards strategic estrangement. However, the article argues that the reactive and intergovernmental nature of EU foreign and security policy continues to hamper more autonomous policy planning in CSDP matters – different readings about cyclical disruptions in EU-US relations notwithstanding. The article finally discusses how the introduction of new CSDP mechanisms impacts on this debate.

References

A European Defence Fund: €5.5 billion per year to boost Europe’s defence capabilities, Press Release, 7 June 2017, http://europa.eu/rapid/pressrelease_IP-17-1508_en.htm (access 24.09.2019).

Ambos A., NATO-EU Relations, in: European Foreign Policy – From Rhetoric to Reality?, eds. D. Mahncke, A. Ambos, C. Reynolds, College of Europe Studies, 2004.

Baker A., American empire – a dangerous distortion?, “Review of International Studies”, Vol. 26/2010, pp. 1–11, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0260210510000331.

Boffey D., Rankin J., Trump rebukes Nato leaders for not paying defense bills, “The Guardian”, 25 May 2017, https://www.theguardian.com/ world/2017/may/25/trump-rebukes-nato-leaders-for-not-payingdefense-bills (access 21.11.2017).

Brunn G., Die Europaïsche Einigung von 1945 bis heute, Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, Bonn 2006.

Buyck C., German military study: EU collapse conceivable worst case, “Politico”, 11 April 2017, “Politico”, 11 April 2017, https://www.politico.eu/article/ german-military-study-eu-collapse-is-conceivable/ (access 24.09.2019).

Daalder I.H., Lindsay J.M., America Unbound: The Bush Revolution in Foreig Policy, Wiley, New York 2003.

Deutsch K. et al., Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1957.

Duke S., The European Security Strategy in a Comparative Framework: Does it Make for Secure Alliances in a Better World?, “European Foreign Affairs Review”, Vol. 9/2004, pp. 459–481.

EU Global Strategy: Implementation plan on security and defence, Infographic, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/infographics/eu-global-strategy/ (access 24.11.2017).

Exploring the “Bullshit Castle”. Airbus Corruption Scandal May Lea Straight to the Top, SPIEGEL online, 9 October 2017, http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/airbus-corruption-scandal-threatens-ceo-tomenders-a-1171533-2.html (access 24.11.2017).

Falk R.A., The Declining World Order. America’s Imperial Geopolitics, Routledge, London/New York 2004.

Gaddis J.L, The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1987.

Goldberg G., The Obama Doctrine, The Atlantic, April Issue 2016, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/04/the-obamadoctrine/471525/ (access 24.11.2017).

Granieri R.J., Allies and Other Strangers: European Integration and the American “Empire by Invitation”, “Foreign Policy Research Institute”, Fall 2006, pp. 691–707, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2006.07.009.

Haine J.Y., The failure of a European strategic culture – EUFOR CHAD: the Last of its kind?, “Contemporary Security Policy”, Vol. 32, No. 3/2011, pp. 582–603, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2011.623060.

Hellema D., Neutraliteit & Vrijhandel. De geschiedenis van de Nederlandse buitenlandse betrekkingen, Het Spectrum, Utrecht 2001.

Hoffmann S., Discord in Community: The North Atlantic Area as a Partial International System, “International Organization”, Vol. 17, No. 3/1963, pp. 521–549, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300034536.

Howorth J., Keeler J.T.S., Defending Europe. The EU, NATO and the Quest for European Autonomy, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke 2003, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403981363_1.

Howorth J., EU-NATO cooperation: the key to Europe’s security future, “European Security”, Vol. 26, No. 3/2017, pp. 454–459, DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2017.1352584.

Howorth J., The Lisbon Treaty, CSDP and the EU as a Security Actor, in: The EU’s Foreign Policy. What Kind of Power and Diplomatic Action?, eds. M. Telò, F. Ponjaert, Ashgate, Farnham 2013.

Jarausch K.H., Out of the Ashes. A New History of Europe in the Twentieth Century, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford 2015, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400865598.

Judt T., Postwar. A History of Europe Since 1945, Pimlico, London 2015.

Kagan R., Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order, Alfred Knopf, New York 2003.

Kempin R., Kunz B., Washington Should Help Europe Achieve Strategic Autonomy, Not Fight It, War on the Rocks, Commentary, 12 April 2018, https://warontherocks.com/2018/04/washington-should-help-europeachieve-strategic-autonomy-not-fight-it/ (access 24.11.2017).

Kempin R., Mawdsley J., The Common Security and Defense Policy as an act of American hegemony, “European Security”, Vol. 22, No. 1/2013, pp. 55–73, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2012.726221.

Keukeleire S., MacNaughtan J., The Foreign Policy of the European Union, Palgrave, Basingstoke 2018.

Kleine-Brockhoff T., Ohne, aber nicht gegen Washington, “Internationale Politik” November/December 2018, pp. 38–47.

Kotzias N., Liacouras P., EU–US Relations: Repairing the Transatlantic Rift, Palgrave Macmillan, New York 2006, DOI: https://doi. org/10.1057/9780230503670.

Krastev I., Sorry, NATO. Trump Doesn’t Believe in Allies, The New York Times, 11 July 2018, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/11/opinion/ trump-nato-summit-allies.html (access 24.11.2017).

Lak M., The Early Years of European Integration – German and Dutch Reactions to the Schuman Plan, in: Governance and Security Issues of the European Union. Challenges Ahead, eds. J. de Zwaan, M. Lak, A. Makinwa, P. Willems, T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague 2016, pp. 11–32, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-144-9_2.

Lak M., Tot elkaar veroordeeld. De Nederlands-Duitse economische en politieke betrekkingen tussen 1945–1957, Verloren, Hilversum 2015.

Lake D., Entangling Relations: American Foreign Policy in its Century, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1999.

Lippert B., von Ondarza N., Perthes V., European Strategic Autonomy. Actors, Issues, Conflicts of Interests, “SWP Research Paper”, No. 4, March 2019.

Long B., No Easy Occupation. French Control of the German Saar, 1944– 1957, Camden House, Rochester/New York 2015.

Lundestad G., Empire by Invitation? The United States and Western Europe, 1945–1952, “Journal of Peace Research”, Vol. 23, No. 3/1986, pp. 263– 277, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002234338602300305.

Lundestad G., The Rise & Decline of the American “Empire”. Power and its Limits in Comparative Perspective, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012.

Lundestad G., The United States and Western Europe since 1945: from ‘empire’ by invitation to transatlantic drift, Oxford University Press, Oxford, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199266689.001.0001.

Maas H., Speech by Foreign Minister Heiko Maas at the opening of the 16th Ambassadors Conference at the Federal Foreign Office, https://www. auswaertiges-amt.de/en/newsroom/news/maas-freeland-ambassadorsconference/2130332 (access 24.09.2019).

Macron E., Speech at Sorbonne University, 26 September 2017, http:// international.blogs.ouest-france.fr/archive/2017/09/29/macronsorbonne-verbatim-europe-18583.html (access 10.07.2019).

Mälksoo M., From the ESS to the EU Global Strategy: external policy, internal purpose, “Contemporary Security Policy”, Vol. 37, No. 3/2016, pp. 374– 388, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2016.1238245.

Meier A., Scheffer U., Militärische Zusammenarbeit in der EU: ein Meilenstein dank Donald Trump, “Euractiv”, 14 November 2017, https://www.euractiv.de/section/eu-aussenpolitik/news/militaerischezusammenarbeit-in-der-eu-ein-meilenstein-dank-donald-trump/ (access 24.09.2019).

Merkel A., Rede von Bundeskanzlerin Merkel vor dem Europäischen Parlament am 13. November 2018 in Straßburg. 13 November, https://www. bundeskanzlerin.de/bkin-de/aktuelles/rede-von-bundeskanzlerinmerkel-vor-dem-europaeischen-parlament-am-13-november-2018-instrassburg-1549538 (access 24.08.2019).

Notification on Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) to the Council and to the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, 13 November 2017, http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ media/31511/171113-pesco-notifi cation.pdf (access 24.11.2017).

Puglierin J., Rolle rückwärts, “Internationale Politik”, September/October, No. 5/2018, pp. 8–13. Quille G., The European Security Strategy: a framework for EU security interests?, “International Peacekeeping”, Vol. 11, No. 3/2007, pp. 422– 438, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1353331042000249028.

Rees W., The US-EU Security Relationship, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke 2011, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-28556-0.

Ruane K., Agonizing Reappraisals: Anthony Eden, John Fuster Dulles and the Crisis of European Defense, 1953–1954, “Diplomacy & Statecraft”, Vol. 13, No. 4/2002, pp. 151–185, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/714000354.

Segers M., Nederland en de Europese integratie, in: De wereld volgens Nederland. Nederlandse buitenlandse politiek in historische perspectief, eds. J. Pekelder, R. Raben, M. Segers, Boom, Amsterdam 2015, pp. 83–106.

Serfati S., Impérialisme et militarisme: actualité du XXIe siècle, Éditions Page Deux, Lausanne 2004.

Smith M., Transatlantic security relations since the European security strategy: what role for the EU in its pursuit of strategic autonomy?, “Journal of European Integration”, Vol. 40, No. 5/2018, pp. 605–620, DOI: https://doi.o rg/10.1080/07036337.2018.1488840.

Stokes D., Trump, American hegemony and the future of the liberal international order, “International Affairs”, Vol. 94, No. 1/2018, pp. 133–150, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix238.

The EU and the European Security Strategy. Forging a global Europe, eds. S. Biscop, J.J. Andersson, Routledge, London and New York 2008, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203945582.

The Military Planning and Conduct Capability (MPCC), November 2018, https://cdn4-eeas.fpfis.tech.ec.europa.eu/cdn/farfuture/aGKF41zrLDLuNeg8csm24scxmjEwj4JBvrRbaLeaY4M/mtime:1542656575/sites/ eeas/files/mpcc_factsheet_november_2018.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0aedfsd SDmzli6o7MuzWGeUl1iuhunQvYbWeYzmcHBvDC53psf30XOWmw (access 24.09.2019).

Tocci N., The Demise of the International Liberal Order and the Future of the European Project, “Istituto Affari Internazionali”, November 2018, http://www.iai.it/en/pubblicazioni/demise-international-liberal-orderand-future-european-project (access 24.09.2019).

Tocci N., The making of the EU Global Strategy, “Contemporary Security Policy”, Vol. 37, No. 3/2016, pp. 461–472, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2016.1232559.

Toje A., America, the EU and Strategic Culture. Renegotiating the Transatlantic Bargain, Routledge, London and New York 2008, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203929704.

Ulrich B., ‘Ihr langer Weg nach Trudering, ZEIT online, 31 May 2017, https://www.zeit.de/2017/23/angela-merkel-transatlantische-beziehungen-kritik-donald-trump (access 21.11.2017).

Webber M., NATO: the United States, transformation and the war in Afghanistan, “British Journal of Politics and International Relations”, Vol. 11, No. 1/2009, pp. 46–63, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856- x.2008.00349.x.

White Paper on the Future of Europe. Reflections and scenarios for the EU27 by 2025, March 2017, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/betapolitical/files/white_paper_on_the_future_of_europe_en.pdf (access 24.11.2017).

Woodward B., Fear. Trump in the White House, Simon & Schuster, London 2018.

Worth O., Beyond world order and transnational classes. The (re)application of Gramsci in global politics, in: Gramsci and global politics: hegemony and resistance, eds. M. McNally, J. Schwarzmantel, Routledge, London and New York 2009, pp. 19–31.

Worth O., Recasting Gramsci in international politics, “Review of International Studies”, Vol. 37, No. 1/2011, pp. 373–392, DOI: https://doi. org/10.1017/S0260210510000318.

Wright T., A post-American Europe and the future of U.S. strategy, Brookings Report, December 2017, https://www.brookings.edu/research/a-postamerican-europe-and-the-future-of-u-s-strategy/ (access 24.11.2017).

Language: English

Pages: 23-44

How to Cite:

Harvard

Pieper, M. and Lak, M. (2019) "The End of Transatlanticism? EU Security and Defence Policies and the ‘Strategic Autonomy’ Debate from a Historical and Contemporary Perspective". Studia Europejskie – Studies in European Affairs, 4/2019, pp. 23-44. DOI: 10.33067/SE.4.2019.2

APA
Chicago