ISSUE: 1/2018

  • Volume 85
  • Number 1
  • 2018

Subscribe NEWSLETTER

Studia Europejskie –
Studies in European Affairs

ISSN: 1428-149X
e-ISSN: 2719-3780

Ccbync License

License

Articles published in the journal are under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivatives 4.0 International License

Referendum brytyjskie w 2016 r. z perspektywy teorii formowania się preferencji państw członkowskich UE

The British 2016 Referendum in the Light of Theories of Preference Formation of EU Member States

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to place the case of the British 2016 referendum on whether to remain or leave the EU within theories of preference formation. Events and processes observed recently such the politicization of European integration, the growth of Eurosceptic and populist parties and movements, and more and more frequent reliance on voters’ opinions expressed in referendums – of which the British 2016 referendum is a special case – beg to consider which theories are best placed to explain these developments. The answer to these questions have a profound importance both from the perspective of EU politics, and allows for a better understanding of British politics too. The analysis spans since 1990s, thus stressing the importance of a long-standing processes for preference formation. In conclusion, the author assigns the highest explanatory power to historical institutionalism, focusing on the key role of British party politics, and intra-party divides in particular.

References

Aspinwall M., Structuring Europe: Powersharing institutions and British preferences on European integration, „Political Studies”, no. 48(3)/2000.

Bakker R., De Vries C., Edwards E., Hooghe L., Jolly S., Marks G., Vachudova M.A., Measuring party positions in Europe The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010, „Party Politics”, no. 21(1)2017.

Bauer M.W., Becker S., The unexpected winner of the crisis: The European Commission’s strengthened role in economic governance, „Journal of European Integration”, no. 36(3)/2014.

Beach D., The dynamics of European integration : why and when EU institutions matter, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, New York 2005.

Blair A., Britain and the Negotiation of the Lisbon Treaty, w: The Making of the EU’s Lisbon Treaty (PIE Peter Lang), red. F. Laursen, Peter Lang, New York 2012.

Bulmer S., New Labour, New European Policy? Blair, Brown and Utilitarian Supranationalism, „Parliamentary Affairs”, no. 61(4)/2008.

Cowley P., Stuart M., Where has all the trouble gone? British intra-party parliamentary divisions during the Lisbon ratifi cation, „British Politics”, no. 5(2)/2010.

Dawson M., Witte F., Constitutional Balance in the EU after the Euro Crisis, „The Modern Law Review”, no. 76(5)/2013.

Dehousse R., Why has EU macroeconomic governance become more supranational?, „Journal of European Integration”, no. 38(5)/2016.

Dimitrakopoulos D.G., Kassim H., Deciding the Future of the European Union: Preference Formation and Treaty Reform, „Comparative European Politics”, no. 2(3)/2004.

Forster A., Britain: still an awkward partner?, „Journal of European Studies”, no. 6(2)/1998.

Forster A., Euroscepticism in contemporary British politics: Opposition to Europe in the British Conservative and Labour parties since 1945, Routledge, London–New York 2002.

Gagatek W., The Economic and Financial Crisis in the Light of Theories of European Integration, w: European Union on the Global Scene: United or Irrelevant?, red. B. Góralczyk, Centre for Europe, University of Warsaw, Warsaw 2015.

George S., An Awkward Partner: Britain in the European Community, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1990.

Gowland D., Turner A., Reluctant Europeans: Britain and European Integration 1945–1998, Routledge, London 2014.

Hine D., Explaining Italian Preferences at the Constitutional Convention, „Comparative European Politics”, no. 2(3)/2004.

Hobolt S.B., Europe in question: referendums on European integration, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2009.

Hobolt S.B., The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent, „Journal of European Public Policy”, no. 23(9)/2016.

Hooghe L., Marks G., Calculation, community and cues. Public opinion on European integration. „European Union Politics”, no. 6(4)/2005.

Hooghe L., Marks G., A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus, „British Journal of Political Science”, no. 39(1)/2009.

Jensen M. D., Snaith H., When politics prevails: the political economy of a Brexit, „Journal of European Public Policy”, no. 23(9)/2016.

Jesień, L., Europa w lustrze eurosceptycyzmu. Brytyjska Partia Konserwatywna wobec integracji europejskiej, Nowy Sącz 1999.

Kassim H., The United Kingdom and the future of Europe: Winning the battle, losing the war, „Comparative European Politics”, no. 2(3)/2004.

Laffan B., The state of our unsettled Union, „International Journal of Constitutional Law”, no. 12(4)/2014.

Moravcsik A., Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach, „JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies”, no. 31(4)/1993.

Niemann A., Ioannou D., European economic integration in times of crisis: a case of neofunctionalism?, „Journal of European Public Policy”, no. 22(2)/2015.

O’Donnell C., Whitman R.G., European policy under Gordon Brown: perspectives on a future prime minister, „International Affairs”, no. 83(2)/2007.

Oppermann K., The Blair government and Europe: The policy of containing the salience of European integration, „British Politics”, no. 2(3)/2008.

Polk J. et al., Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruptionfor political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data, „Research & Politics”, no. 4(1)/2017.

Richardson J., Gustafsson G., Jordan G., The concept of policy style, w: Policy styles in western Europe, red. J. Richardson, Allen & Unwin, London 1982.

Schimmelfennig F., European integration in the euro crisis: the limits of postfunctionalism, „Journal of European Integration”, no. 36(3)/2014.

Schimmelfennig F., Liberal intergovernmentalism and the euro area crisis, „Journal of European Public Policy”, no. 22(2)/2015.

Schimmelfennig F., A differentiated leap forward: spillover, path-dependency, and graded membership in European banking regulation, „West European Politics”, no. 39(3)/2016.

Schmidt V.A., European member state elites’ diverging visions of the European Union: Diverging differently since the economic crisis and the Libyan intervention?, „Journal of European Integration”, no. 34(2)/2012.

Trzaskowski R., Dynamika reformy systemu podejmowania decyzji w Unii Europejskiej, Wyd. Prawo i Praktyka Gospodarcza, Warszawa 2005.

Usherwood, S., Opposition to the European Union in the UK. The Dilemma of Public Opinion and Party Management, „Government and Opposition”, no. 37(2)/2002.

Wallace W., Foreign policy and national identity in the United Kingdom, „International Affairs”, no. 67(1)/1991.

Wilks S., Britain and Europe: An Awkward Partner or an Awkward State?, „Politics”, no. 16(3)/1996.

Language: Polish

Pages: 69-88

How to Cite:

Harvard

Gagatek, W. (2018) "Referendum brytyjskie w 2016 r. z perspektywy teorii formowania się preferencji państw członkowskich UE". Studia Europejskie – Studies in European Affairs, 1/2018, pp. 69-88.

APA
Chicago