ISSUE: 2/2024

  • Volume 28
  • Number 2
  • 2024

Subscribe NEWSLETTER

Studia Europejskie –
Studies in European Affairs

ISSN: 1428-149X
e-ISSN: 2719-3780

Ccbync License

License

Articles published in the journal are under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivatives 4.0 International License

Development Of Scientific Journals

Publication co-financed by Ministry of Science and Higher Education pursuant to the Regulation of the Minister of Education and Science of 3 August 2021 (Journal of Laws of 2021, item 1514) on the “Development of Scientific Journals” programme.

Publikacja dofinansowana przez Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego na podstawie rozporządzenia Ministra Edukacji i Nauki z 3 sierpnia 2021 r. (Dz. U. z 2021 r. poz. 1514) w sprawie programu „Rozwój czasopism naukowych”.

Idub Logo

Publication co-financed by the University of Warsaw within the “Excellence Initiative – Research University” programme.

Czasopismo otrzymało dofinasowanie w ramach Programu „Inicjatywa Doskonałości – Uczelnia Badawcza”.

Lessons That Poland Can Learn From Brexit

Abstract

The UK’s exit from the European Union has had seriously negative consequences for the British economy and society. These consequences can be taken as a serious warning to other EU countries that may wish to follow Britain’s chosen path. The warning is particularly important as regards Poland, where the far right has long been openly calling for a so-called “Polexit”. The aim of this article is to analyse and assess both the current and expected effects of Brexit, as well as the conclusions that Poland can draw from them. After presenting the background of Brexit, this analysis focuses primarily on the effects that Great Britain has experienced in the areas of trade with the EU, along with Brexit’s effects on investment, inflation, immigration, and deregulation. Public opinion survey results are also shown, indicating a negative assessment of Brexit by the majority of British society, which is increasingly demanding the restoration of the country’s ties with the EU. Next, the threats to Poland’s further participation in the EU that have arisen since 2015 are shown. Based on Britain’s experience, it can be predicted that a possible Polexit may hit the Polish economy particularly hard, primarily due to the loss of free access to the EU’s single market and a possible collapse with regard to Polish exports, as well as the predicted massive outflow of capital abroad and decline in the inflow of foreign investments. A Polexit would also mean a loss of EU funding. All this would drastically limit Poland’s development possibilities and would trigger a civilisational degradation of the country.

References

Bakker, J.D., Datta, N., Davies, R. and De Lyon, J. (2022) Non-tariff barriers and consumer prices: evidence from Brexit. Discussion Paper No. 1888, December. Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science. Available at: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp1888.pdf (Access 1.04.2024).

Baschuk B. (2023) “UK Saw Foreign Investment Collapse After Brexit, UN Says”, Bloomberg, 5.07. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-07-05/uk-saw-foreign-investment-collapse-after-brexit-un-says#xj4y7vzkg (Access 12.04.2024).

BBC (2016) “EU referendum results. UK votes to leave the EU”. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/politics/eu_referendum/results (Access 5.04.2024).

Bell, E. (2019) “Brexit: towards a neoliberal real utopia?”, L’Observatoire de la société britannique. No. 24, pp. 45–66. DOI: 10.4000/osb.3196.

Boese, V.A. et al. (2022) Autocratization Changing Nature? Democracy Report 2022. Varieties of Democracy Institute at the University of Gothenburg (V-Dem), pp. 1–60. Available at: https://v-dem.net/media/publications/dr_2022.pdf (Access 10.04.2024).

Breinlich, H. et al. (2022) “The Brexit vote, inflation and the U.K. living standards”, International Economic Review. Vol. 63(1), pp. 63–93. DOI: 10.1111/iere.12541.

Buigut, S. and Kapar, B. (2023) “How did Brexit impact EU trade? Evidence from real data”, World Economy (Wiley). Vol. 46, pp. 1566–1581. DOI: 10.1111/twec.13419.

Burford, R. (2023) “«Brexit idiocy» blamed for tech giant ARM choosing New York over London”, The Standard, 2.05. Available at: https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/brexit-arm-new-york-london-stock-exchange-listing-b1078116.html (Access 2.04.2024).

CBOS (2023) Opinions on Poland`s membership in the European Union. Available at: https://www.cbos.pl/EN/publications/reports/2023/055_23.pdf (Access 2.04.2024).

Coyle, Ch. (2021) “How has Brexit affected the value of sterling?”, Economics Observatory, 22.02. Available at: https://www.economicsobservatory.com/how-has-brexit-affected-the-value-of-sterling (Access 16.04.2024).

Dayan, M. (2023) What has Brexit meant to the NHS?, 10.02. Available at: https://ukandeu.ac.uk/what-has-brexit-meant-for-the-nhs/ (Access 12.04.2024).

Dhingra, S. et al. (2022) The Big Brexit: An assessment of the scale of change to come from Brexit. The Resolution Foundation. Available at: https://www.resolutionfoundation.org/app/uploads/2022/06/The-Big-Brexit_.pdf (Access 6.04.2024).

Devlin, K. (2023) “Brexit poll: Two-thirds of Britons now support future referendum on rejoining the EU Exclusive: Results suggest Leave voters disillusioned with the «taking back of control they were promised»”, Independent, 1.01. Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-poll-referendum-rejoin-eu-b2250813.html (Access 9.04.2024).

Du, J., Satoglu, E.B. and Shepotylo, O. (2022) Post-Brexit UK Trade: An Update. Centre for Business Prosperity Insight Paper, Aston University. November, pp. 1–27. Available at: https://www.lbpresearch.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Post-Brexit-UK-Trade-Updated.pdf (Access 9.04.2024).

Duncan Smith, I., Villiers, T. and Freeman, G. (2021) Taskforce on Innovation, Growth and Regulatory Reform. May, pp. 1–130. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/994125/FINAL_TIGRR_REPORT__1_.pdf (Access 10.04.2024).

Eurobarometer (2023) “Standard Eurobarometer 99 – Spring 2023” Country Factsheets in English-Poland, pp. 1–4. Available at: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/3052 (Access 2.04.2024).

European Commission (2023a) EU trade relations with the United Kingdom. Facts, figures and latest developments. Available at: https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu-trade-relationships-country-and-region/countries-and-regions/united-kingdom_en (Access 1.03.2024).

European Commission (2023b) The European Commission decides to refer POLAND to the Court of Justice of the European Union for violations of EU law by its Constitutional Tribunal. 15.02. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_842 (Access 1.03.2024).

European Commission (2023c) 2023 Rule of Law Report. The rule of law situation in the European Union, 2023 Rule of Law Report Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Poland. Brussels, 5.07. SWD(2023) 821 final. Available at: https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2023-07/48_1_52627_coun_chap_poland_en.pdf (Access 1.03.2024).

European Movement UK (2023) Let’s smash the political silence on Brexit, Crowdfunder. Available at: https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/p/lets-smash-the-political-silence-on-brexit (Access 2.04.2024).

Freedland, J. (2022) “The reality of Brexit is biting hard. Poor people are suffering most – and now everyone can see it”, The Guardian. 2.12. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/dec/02/brexit-poor-people-paying-eat-debate-human (Access 5.04.2024).

Hain, P. (2022) “The signs are clear. Our destiny lies with Europe, not a «sovereign global Britain» fantasy”, The Guardian. 11.12. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/dec/11/signs-are-clear-our-destiny-lies-with-europe-not-sovereign-global-britain-fantasy?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other (Access 12.04.2024).

Hall, S. (2023) What has been the impact of Brexit on the UK economy? 7.03. Available at: https://www.openaccessgovernment.org/article/impact-brexit-uk-economy-covid-19-ukraine-war/154378/ (Access 12.04.2024).

Heseltine, M. (2022) “Brexit and Devolution: More slogan than substance”, European Movement UK. 15.11. Available at: https://www.europeanmovement.co.uk/lord_heseltine_delivers_the_heseltine_institute_inaugural_lecture_tung_auditorium_yoko_ono_lennon_centre_university_of_liverpool_tuesday_november_15_2022_5_30_pm (Access 15.04.2024).

HM Government (2022) The Benefits of Brexit: How the UK is taking advantage of leaving the EU, January, pp. 1–105. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1054643/benefits-of-brexit.pdf (Access 10.04.2024).

Huggins, R. (2023) Levelling up alone won’t help many of the UK’s “left-behind” places. 2.05. Available at: https://theconversation.com/levelling-up-alone-wont-help-many-of-the-uks-left-behind-places-203462 (Access 14.04.2024).

Hughes, R. (2021) Impact of Brexit on economy “worse than Covid”. BBC, 27.10. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-59070020 (Access 25.04.2024).

Ilzetzki, E. and Jain, S. (2023) Prospects for UK potential output. 26.04. Available at: https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/prospects-uk-potential-output (Access 2.04.2024).

Kren, J. and Lawless, M. (2022) How has Brexit changed EU-UK trade flows? Economic and Social Research Institute (Dublin), ESRI Working Paper No. 735, pp. 1–29, October. Available at: https://www.esri.ie/system/files/publications/WP735_0.pdf (Access 27.04.2024).

Landler, M. (2022) “Buffeted by Economic Woes, U.K. Starts to Look at Brexit With «Bregret»”, The New York Times. 22.11. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/22/world/europe/uk-brexit-regret.html (Access 25.11.2022).

Legrain, P. (2023) A Brexit Reset? 1.03. Available at: https://www.project-syndicate.org/ (Access 5.04.2024).

Le Monde (2023), “Three years after Brexit, time for «Bregret»”, Le Monde. 6.02. Available at: https://www.lemonde.fr/en/opinion/article/2023/02/06/three-years-after-brexit-time-for-bregret_6014609_23.html (Access 24.04.2024).

Mahmud, H. (2020) “Brexit: The scapegoating of the EU for the failures of British Neoliberalism?”, NEXTEUK Working Paper Series. 24.01, pp. 1–27. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3854841.

Marshall, J. and Goss, D. (2022) What «benefits of Brexit» does the government claim? Institute for Government. 1.04. Available at: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/article/explainer/what-benefits-brexit-does-government-claim (Access 10.04.2024).

Mata, W. (2023) “Five big Brexit promises – and what we got instead”, Independent. 21.02. Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/brexit-referendum-vote-timeline-b2286381.html (Access 15.04.2024).

McCarey, M. et al. (2022) Health and Brexit: six years on. Nuffield Trust, pp. 1–65. Available at: https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/files/2022-12/1671199514-health-and-brexit-web.pdf (Access 2.04.2024).

McTague, T. (2023) Labour is winning the Brexit revolution. 30.01. Available at: https://unherd.com/2023/01/labour-is-winning-the-brexit-revolution/ (Access 22.04.2024).

Ministerstwo Finansów (2023) Transfery finansowe Polska – budżet UE. Available at: https://www.gov.pl/web/finanse/transfery-polska-ue-unia-europejska (Access 15.04.2024).

Nikolka, T. and Poutvaara, P. (2016) “Brexit – Theory and Empirics”, CESifo Forum. Vol. 17(4), pp. 68–75. ISSN 2190-717X. ifo Institut – Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München, München. Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/166672/1/cesifo-forum-v17-y2016-i4-p68-75.pdf (Access 2.03.2024).

OBR (2022) Brexit analysis. 26.05. Available at: https://obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/the-economy-forecast/brexit-analysis/#assumptions (Access 16.04.2024).

Omnisis (2023), VI-47 Voter Intention. Conducted between 10 Aug 2023 and 11 Aug 2023. Available at: https://www.omnisis.co.uk/poll-results/vi-47-results-11-08-2023/ (Access 6.04.2024).

ONS (2023) Long-term international migration, provisional: year ending December 2022. 25.05. Available at: https:/www.ons.gov. uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/internationalmigration/bulletins/longterminternationalmigrationprovisional/year endingdecember2022 (Access 15.04.2024).

Parsons, C. (2018) “Brexit rooted more in elite politics than mass resentment”, The Conversation. 13.12. Available at: https://theconversation.com/brexit-rooted-more-in-elite-politics-than-mass-resentment-107133 (Access 10.04.2024).

Portes, J. (2022) “Trade, migration, and Brexit”, Vox EU (CEPR). 8.09. Available at: https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/trade-migration-and-brexit (Access 26.04.2024).

Portes, J. and Springford, J. (2023) Early impacts of the post-Brexit immigration system on the UK labour market. 17.01. Available at: https://www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/insight_JS_JP_17.1.23.pdf (Access 22.04.2024).

Posen, A.S. and Rengifo-Keller, L. (2022) Brexit is driving inflation higher in the UK than its European peers after identical supply shocks. Peterson Institute for International Economics, 24.05. Available at: https://www.piie.com/research/piie-charts/brexit-driving-inflation-higher-uk-its-european-peers-after-identical-supply (Access 9.04.2024).

Rachman, G. (2023) “Brexit could be reversed – here’s how”, Financial Times. 6.02. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/0d195d46-b348-4325-824f-c33889bb2cc0?shareType=nongift (Access 7.04.2024).

Rankin, J. (2023) “European Commission takes Poland to court over «legal Polexit»”, The Guardian. 15.02. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/feb/15/european-commission-takes-poland-to-court-over-legal-polexit (Access 28.04.2024).

Sandford, A. (2023) “Post-Brexit Guide: What’s been the impact — and how did it happen?”, Euronews. 10.03. Available at: https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2022/12/29/brexit-draft-deal-first-of-many-hurdles-to-a-smooth-exit (Access 7.04.2024).

Savanta (2023) Brexit Poll – Independent – 1 January 2023. Available at: https://savanta.com/knowledge-centre/published-polls/brexit-poll-the-independent-1-january-2023/ (Access 12.04.2024).

Sheibani, A. (2023) “UK’s shocking export performance since Brexit impacts North Wales”, The Leader. 14.03. Available at: https://www.leaderlive.co.uk/news/23381605.uks-shocking-export-performance-since-brexit-impacts-north-wales/ (Access 16.03.2024).

Sierakowski, S. (2021) “The possibility of Polexit”, Project Syndicate. 19.10. Available at: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/polexit-pis-government-constitutional-tribunal-ruling-by-slawomir-sierakowski-2021-10 (Access 1.03.2024).

Sierakowski, S. (2023) “Poland’s Legal Mess”, Project Syndicate. 17.02. Available at: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/poland-legal-mess-failure-to-enact-reforms-for-eu-funds-by-slawomir-sierakowski-2023-02 (Access 28.02.2024).

Spisak, A. (2022) Moving On: How the British Public Views Brexit and What It Wants From the Future Relationship With the European Union. 18.10. Available at: https://www.institute.global/insights/economic-prosperity/moving-how-british-public-views-brexit-and-what-it-wants-future-relationship-european-union (Access 25.11.2022).

Stone, J. (2022) “«Recklessly irresponsible» Brexit rush to axe EU laws is putting safety standards at risk, watchdogs warn”, Independent. 25.11. Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-eu-laws-regulations-b2232212.html (Access 2.03.2024).

Stone, J. (2023) “Britain will rejoin EU in future, Tony Blair says”, Independent. 28.07. Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-tony-blair-eu-rejoin-b2383165.html (Access 1.08.2023).

Statistics Poland (2023) Foreign trade turnover of goods in total and by countries in 2022. 31.07. Available at: https://stat.gov.pl/en/topics/prices-trade/trade/foreign-trade-turnover-of-goods-in-total-and-by-countries-in-2022,2,15.html (Access 2.03.2024).

Ward, M. and Webb, D. (2023) Statistics on UK-EU trade, The Commons Library, https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7851/CBP-7851.pdf (Access 2.03.2024).

World Bank (2023) Foreign direct investment, net inflows – United Kingdom. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.CD.WD?locations=GB and https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS?locations=GB (Access 2.03.2024).

Download pdf[plus]

Language: English

Pages: 67-88

How to Cite:

Harvard

Oręziak, L. (2024) "Lessons That Poland Can Learn From Brexit". Studia Europejskie – Studies in European Affairs, 2/2024, pp. 67-88. DOI: 10.33067/SE.2.2024.4

APA
Chicago