ISSUE: 4/2018

  • Volume 22
  • Number 4
  • 2018

Subscribe NEWSLETTER

Studia Europejskie –
Studies in European Affairs

ISSN: 1428-149X
e-ISSN: 2719-3780

Ccbync License

License

Articles published in the journal are under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivatives 4.0 International License

Gender Stereotypes and EU Antidiscrimination Case Law: (Fighting) a Hidden Threat to the EU Value of Equality?

Abstract

Nowadays law is considered to be an effective instrument of shaping social reality. In this context special attention must be paid to gender equality law and jurisprudence which setting protection against unequal treatment because of someone’s gender intend to make a balance between individual’s identity and social expectations related to his or her role. These social preconceptions based on gender stereotypes must be contested insofar as they serve as an instrument to rationalize inequality between women and men. The aim of the article to explore the gender stereotypes in the anti-discriminatory judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The article claims that the CJEU’s case law is unambiguous with respect to this. On the one hand the Court contributes to eradication of stereotypes based on gender in some cases, on the other – it reinforces them in the other. The article starts with explanation of the role of the gender equality principle in the EU legal system. It also makes some general remarks on stereotypes, biases and discrimination. The second part is devoted to the CJEU case law in which the Court, explicitly or implicitly, avoids applying the gender stereotypes lens to equality issue. The third part of the article analyses those of the CJEU judgments which, unfortunately, can be considered as perpetuating gender stereotypes and as such discrimination based on them.

References

Bell M. , Shifting Conceptions of Sexual Discrimination at the Court of Justice: from P v S to Grant v SWT, “European Law Journal”, vol. 5 (1)/1999.

C- 32/93 Webb [1994] ECR I-03567.

C-104/09 Roca Álvarez [2010] ECR I-08661.

C-158/97 Badeck [2000] ECR I-01875.

C-163/82 Commission v Italy [1983] ECR 03273.

C-177/88 Dekker [1990] ECR I-03941.

C-184/83 Hoffman [1984] ECR 03047.

C-236/09 Test-Achats [2011] ECR I-00773.

C-409/95 Marschall [1997] ECR I-06363.

Cook R., Cusack S., Gender Stereotyping Transnational Legal Perspectives, Pennsylvania 2010.

Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast), OJ 2006 L 204/23.

Ellis E., Watson P., EU Anti-Discrimination Law, Oxford 2014.

https://cultureplusconsulting.com/2015/05/24/unconscious-bias-stereotypes-prejudice-discrimination/.

Kochenov D., On Policing Article 2 TEU Compliance – Reverse Solange and Systemic Infringements Analyzed, “Polish Yearbook of International
Law” XXXIII/2013.

Lopez-Zafra E., Garcia-Retamero R., Do gender stereotypes change? The dynamic of gender stereotypes in Spain, “Journal of Gender Studies”, vol. 21 (2)/2012.

McTigu P., From Navas to Kaltoft: The European Court of Justice’s evolving definition of disability and the implications for HIV-positive individuals, “International Journal of Discrimination and the Law”, vol. 15(4)/2015.

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott C-236/09 Test-Achats [2011] ECRI-00773.

Poposka Z., Stereotypes and Prejudices as Cause for Discriminatory Practices– Review of the Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, http://eprints.ugd.edu.mk/16385/.

Schiek D., Intersectionality and the Notion of Disability in EU discrimination law, “Common Market Law Review”, is. 53/2016.

Szczerba-Zawada A., Zasada równego traktowania kobiet i mężczyzn w zakresie składek i świadczeń ubezpieczeniowych – glosa do wyroku TS
z 01.03.2011 r. w sprawie C-236/09 Association Belge des Consommateurs Test-Achats ASBL i inni przeciwko Conseil des ministers (The Principle of Equal Treatment of Women and Men in the Field of Insurance Premiums and Benefits – Comment on the Judgment of the CoJ of 1 March 2011 in Case C-236/09 Association Belge des Consommateurs Test-Achats ASBL and Others v Conseil des ministres), „Europejski Przegląd Sądowy”, no. 6/2012.

Timmer A., Gender Stereotyping in the case law of the EU Court of Justice, “European Equality Law Review”, is. 1/2016.

Weldon-Johns M., EU work-family policies – Challenging parental roles or reinforcing gendered stereotypes?, “European Law Journal”, vol. 19(5)/2013.

Language: English

Pages: 225-234

How to Cite:

Harvard

Szczerba-Zawada, A. (2018) "Gender Stereotypes and EU Antidiscrimination Case Law: (Fighting) a Hidden Threat to the EU Value of Equality?". Studia Europejskie – Studies in European Affairs, 4/2018, pp. 225-234.

APA
Chicago