ISSUE: 4/2017

  • Volume 84
  • Number 4
  • 2017

Subscribe NEWSLETTER

Studia Europejskie –
Studies in European Affairs

ISSN: 1428-149X
e-ISSN: 2719-3780

Ccbync License

License

Articles published in the journal are under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivatives 4.0 International License

Dyrektywa Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2016/681 w sprawie wykorzystywania danych dotyczących przelotu pasażera – adekwatny środek do walki z terroryzmem i poważnymi przestępstwami czy forma masowej inwigilacji?

Directive (EU) 2016/681 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Use of Passenger Name Record (PNR) Data – An Adequate Mean to Fight with Terrorism and Serious Crime or a Mass Surveillance Tool?

Abstract

On 28 April 2016 the Directive (EU) 2016/681 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the use of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime was adopted by the 28 Member States. Regulating this complex issue, European legislator has been obliged to strike a “fair balance” between the objective of combating terrorism and serious crime and the objective of protecting personal data and respecting the private life of the passengers. The aim of this paper is to analyse the provisions which apply to the processing of PNR data in the light of the principle of proportionality.

References

Blasi Casagran C., The Future EU PNR System: Will Passenger Data be Protected?, “European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice”, No. 3/2015.

De Hert P., Papakonstantinou V., Repeating the Mistakes of the Past Will Do Little Good for Air Passengers in the EU: The Comeback of the EU PNR Directive and a Lawyer’s Duty to Regulate Profi ling, “New Journal of European Criminal Law”, No. 2/2015.

Granger M, Irion K., The Court of Justice and the Data Retention Directive in Digital Rights Ireland: Telling Off the EU Legislator and Teaching a Lesson in Privacy and Data Protection, “European Law Review”, No. 6/2014.\

Kaunert C., Leonard S., McKenzie A., The social construction of an EU interest in counter-terrorism: US infl uence and internal struggles in the cases of PNR and SWIFT, “European Security”, No. 4/2012.

Lowe D., The European Union’s Passenger Name Record Data Directive 2016/681: Is it Fit for Purpose?, “International Criminal Law Review”, No. 1/2017.

Rizer A., Dog Fight: Did The International Battle Over Airline Passenger Name Records Enable The Christmas-day Bomber?, “Catholic University Law Review”, No. 1/2010.

Van Wasshnova M.R., Data Protection Confl icts Between the United States and the European Union in the War on Terror: Lessons Learned from the Existing System Of Financial Information Exchange, “Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law”, No. 3/2007.

Vavoula V., ‘I Travel, therefore I Am a Suspect’: an overview of the EU PNR Directive, 26.10.2016 r., http://eumigrationlawblog.eu/i-travel-therefore-iam-a-suspect-an-overview-of-the-eu-pnr-irective/ (dostęp 6.06.2017).

Language: Polish

Pages: 163-183

How to Cite:

Harvard

Wojnowska-Radzińska, J. (2017) "Dyrektywa Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2016/681 w sprawie wykorzystywania danych dotyczących przelotu pasażera – adekwatny środek do walki z terroryzmem i poważnymi przestępstwami czy forma masowej inwigilacji?". Studia Europejskie – Studies in European Affairs, 4/2017, pp. 163-183.

APA
Chicago