ISSUE: 3/2018
- Volume 22
- Number 3
- 2018
Subscribe NEWSLETTER
Studia Europejskie –
Studies in European Affairs
ISSN: 1428-149X
e-ISSN: 2719-3780
License
Articles published in the journal are under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivatives 4.0 International License
Brak wyłącznej kompetencji UE do zawierania umów o wolnym handlu
Lack of the EU Exclusive Competence to Conclude „New Generation” Free Trade Agreements
Abstract
European Union intends to enhance its economic ties with the third countries through the Free Trade Agreements. With the FTA’s with Canada (CETA), United States (TTIP) and Singapore, EU wanted to upgrade the level of mutual cooperation, introducing so called “new generation” of FTA’s. Such agreements are intended to broadly facilitate bilateral trade between the stakeholders, signifi cantly exceeding issues of purely customs nature. The process has been slowed down due to the unclear division of competences between the EU and its Member States. In a longer perspective it may occur that the European Union will have to amend the desired economic relations creation model, to engage in a broader way all of the EU Member States into the decision-making process. For example it can be derived from the recent opinion of the Court of Justice of the EU on the FTA with Singapore.
References
Coleman C., Reality Check: How much UK law comes from the EU?, 8.06.2016, BBC News, http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36473105.
Decyzja Rady (UE) 2017/38 z dnia 28 października 2016 r. w sprawie tymczasowego stosowania Kompleksowej umowy gospodarczo-handlowej (CETA) między Kanadą, z jednej strony, a Unią Europejską i jej państwami członkowskimi, z drugiej strony (OJ L 11, 14.1.2017).
Lange B., Caspary D., Martin D., Interpelacja z dnia 22 czerwca 2017 r., Komisja Handlu Międzynarodowego, Pytanie wymagające odpowiedzi ustnej do Komisji, art. 128 Regulaminu PE, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+OQ+O-2017-000057+0+DOC+XML+V0//PL&language=pl.
Opinia Trybunału (w pełnym składzie) 2/15 z dnia 16 maja 2017 r., Elektroniczny Zbiór Orzeczeń, Identyfi kator ECLI:EU:C:2017:376.
Porozumienie handlowe między UE i USA: Czym jest ISDS?, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/pl/headlines/priorities/20150202TST18313/20150605STO63242/porozumienie-handlowe-miedzy-ue-i-usa-czym-jest-isds.
Proposal for a Council Decision on the provisional application of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part, Strasbourg, 5.7.2016, COM (2016) 470 final, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52016PC0470.
Teffer P., The Dutch rooting for a No in the Ukraine referendum, 30.03.2016, EUobserver, https://euobserver.com/beyond-brussels/132837.
Teffer P., Netherlands ratifies EU–Ukraine treaty, 30.05.2017, EUobserver, https://euobserver.com/foreign/138060.
Total goods: EU Trade flows and balance, annual data 2006–2016, European Union, Trade with Chile, Komisja Europejska, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/september/tradoc_113364.pdf.
Total goods: EU Trade flows and balance, annual data 2006–2016, European Union, Trade with Republic of Korea, Komisja Europejska, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/september/tradoc_113448.pdf.
Traktat o Unii Europejskiej, Dz. Urz. UE C 202 z 2016 r.
Umowa o wolnym handlu między Unią Europejską a Republiką Singapuru, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2014/october/tradoc_152844.pdf.
Wyrok z dnia 18 lipca 2013 r., Daiichi Sankyo i Sanofi -Aventis Deutschland, sygn. C414/11.
Wyrok z dnia 5 listopada 2002 r., Komisja/Dania, sygn. C467/98.
Language: Polish
Pages: 130-151
How to Cite:
Harvard
Łukowski, M. (2018) "Brak wyłącznej kompetencji UE do zawierania umów o wolnym handlu". Studia Europejskie – Studies in European Affairs, 3/2018, pp. 130-151.