ISSUE: 2/2024
- Volume 28
- Number 2
- 2024
Subscribe NEWSLETTER
Studia Europejskie –
Studies in European Affairs
ISSN: 1428-149X
e-ISSN: 2719-3780
License
Articles published in the journal are under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivatives 4.0 International License
Applying Negative Soft Power? Examining Hungary’s Digital Criticism of the European Union
Abstract
This study examines how Hungary’s criticism of the European Union (EU) is reflected in its digital diplomacy efforts. It proposes that systematic criticism of the bloc can be seen as a deliberate use of negative soft power, a tactic that involves portraying others in an unfavourable context. To address the research objective, the study examines the Twitter (now known as X) diplomacy of 40 Hungarian government officials in 2021–2022 and identifies EU-related content and criticism through a semi-automatic content analysis. The results show that while a few central government users systematically and explicitly criticise the EU, other actors balance condemnation with neutral and positive posts. The findings, therefore, indicate that Hungary’s systemic weakness limits the pure export of national discourses and forces soft power strategies to mix critical commentary with neutral and positive representation.
References
Adamczyk, A. (2010) “The Role of Poland in the Creation Process of the Eastern Partnership”, Yearbook of Polish European Studies. Vol. 13, pp. 195–204.
Ágh, A. (2022) “The Third Wave of Autocratization in East-Central Europe”, Journal of Comparative Politics. Vol. 15(2), pp. 72–87.
Ayan Musil, P. and Yardımcı-Geyikçi, Ş. (2024) “Transnationalization of Opposition Strategy under Competitive Authoritarianism: Evidence from Turkey and Hungary”, Government and Opposition. Vol. 59(2), pp. 341–359. DOI: 10.1017/gov.2023.19.
Barr, M. et al. (2015) “Introduction: The Soft Power of Hard States”, Politics. Vol. 35(3–4), pp. 213–215. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9256.12210.
Bjola, C. and Pamment, J. (2019) Countering Online Propaganda and Extremism: The Dark Side of Digital Diplomacy. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781351264082.
Cabula, M. and Pochettino, S. (2023) “Emerging Negative Soft Power: The Evolution of China’s Identity in the 2008 and 2022 Beijing Olympics Opening and Closing Ceremonies”, The International Spectator. Vol. 58, pp. 17–34. DOI: 10.1080/03932729.2023.2195337.
Callahan, W.A. (2015) “Identity and Security in China: The Negative Soft Power of the China Dream”, Politics. Vol. 35(3–4), pp. 216–229. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9256.12088.
Chew, P. et al. (2023) Digital Disinformation. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-28835-7.
Cooper, A.F. (2019) “Adapting Public Diplomacy to the Populist Challenge”, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy. Vol. 14(1–2), pp. 36–50. DOI: 10.1163/1871191X-14101011.
Csehi, R. (2021) The Politics of Populism in Hungary. London and New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/ 9781003035862.
Dudlák, T. (2023) “Béke minden áron: Oroszország ukrajnai inváziója a magyar kormány diskurzusában” [Peace at all costs: Hungarian Foreign Policy Discourse and the Russo-Ukrainian War], Pólusok. Vol. 4(2), pp. 56–79. DOI: 10.15170/PSK.2023.04.02.04.
Dúró, J. and Várnagy, R. (2019) “Fidesz’s Double-Talk Concerning EU Issues”, POLITICAL SCIENCE ONLINE. Vol. 2, pp. 1–18.
Economides, S. (2020) Greek Foreign Policy Since the Metapolitefsi in Featherstone, K. and Sotiropoulos, D.A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Modern Greek Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 597–612. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198825104.013.38.
Éltető, A. and Szemlér, T. (2023) “Hungary in the European Union – Cooperation, Peacock Dance and Autocracy”, Comparative Southeast European Studies. Vol. 71(3), pp. 272–299. DOI: 10.1515/soeu-2022-0051.
Erpul, O. (2023) Digital Diplomacy and International Society in the Age of Populism in Webster Hare, P., Manfredi-Sánchez, J.L. and Weisbrode, K. (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Diplomatic Reform and Innovation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 143–166. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-10971-3_7.
Gilboa, E. (2016) Digital Diplomacy in Constantinou, C.M., Kerr, P. and Sharp, P. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy. London: SAGE, pp. 540–551. DOI: 10.4135/9781473957930.n45.
Gosling, J. (2021) “Maximising Soft Power: The Role of Digital Diplomacy in Building Trust with Nation-Branding”, Global Affairs Review. Vol. 2(1), pp. 1–19. DOI: 10.51330/gar.0020212.
Gotkowska, J. (2021) Poland and the Baltic States: A Preference for a Renewed West in Franceschini, G. (ed.) Between Hard and Soft Power: The European Union in a More Competitive World. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Foundation, pp. 6–9.
Győri, L. (2023) Challenges of Strategic Communication in Hungary. Budapest: Political Capital.
Kacziba, P. (2020) “Political Sources of Hungarian Soft Power”, Politics in Central Europe Vol. 16(1), pp. 81–111. DOI: 10.2478/pce-2020-0005.
Kacziba, P. (2023a) “Magyar kormányzati szereplők digitális diplomáciai tevékenysége a Twitteren (2021–2022)”, Pólusok. Vol. 4(1), pp. 2–26. DOI: 10.15170/PSK.2023.04.01.01.
Kacziba, P. (2023b) “Public Diplomacy on Twitter in 2021 and 2022: The Case of Hungary” [Digital diplomacy activities of Hungarian governmental actors on Twitter (2021–2022)], Mendeley Data. DOI: 10.17632/c2nnrrhmwk.4.
Kiseleva, Y. (2015) “Russia’s Soft Power Discourse: Identity, Status and the Attraction of Power”, Politics. Vol. 35(3–4), pp. 316–329. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9256.12100.
Kopper, A. et al. (2023) Populist Foreign Policy in Central and Eastern Europe: Poland, Hungary and the Shock of the Ukraine Crisis in Giurlando, P. and Wajner, D.F. (eds.) Populist Foreign Policy – Regional Perspectives of Populism in the International Scene. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 89–116. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-22773-8_4.
Krekó, P. (2017) Orbán’s illiberal experiment: the real danger for Europe this year. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Foundation.
Manor, I. (2016) “Are We There Yet: Have MFAs Realized the Potential of Digital Diplomacy?”, Brill Research Perspectives in Diplomacy and Foreign Policy. Vol. 1(2), pp. 1–110. DOI: 10.1163/24056006-12340002.
Manor, I. (2018) “The Digitalization of Diplomacy: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Terminology”, WORKING PAPER SERIES 2, Oxford Digital Diplomacy Research Group, pp. 2–20.
Manor, I. (2019) The Digitalization of Public Diplomacy. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Mazumdar, B.T. (2021) “Digital diplomacy: Internet-based public diplomacy activities or novel forms of public engagement?”, Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. Vol. 20, pp. 24–43. DOI: 10.1057/s41254-021-00208-4.
Merkovity, N. et al. (2021) Hungary in Lilleker, D., Coman, I.A., Gregor, M. and Novelli, E. (eds.) Political Communication and COVID-19. Abington: Routledge, pp. 269–279.
Nye, J.S. (1990) “Soft Power”. Foreign Policy. Vol. 80, Twentieth Anniversary, pp. 153–171. DOI: 10.2307/1148580.
Nye, J.S. (2008a) “Public Diplomacy and Soft Power”, Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. Vol. 616, pp. 94–109. DOI: 10.1177/0002716207311699.
Nye, J.S. (2008b) The Powers to Lead. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ociepka, B. (2013) New Members’ Public Diplomacy in Cross, M.K.D. and Melissen, J. (eds.) European Public Diplomacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 39–56. DOI: 10.1057/9781137315144_3.
Plagemann, J. and Destradi, S. (2020) “The Foreign Policy of Populists”, Horizons. Vol. 15, pp. 110–118.
Rajcsányi, G. (2018) Viktor Orbán’s Hungary: Orbanist Politics and Philosophy from a His-torical Perspective in Echle, C., Kliem, F. and Sarmah, M. (eds.) Political Change, Panorama: Insights into Asian and European Affairs. Singapore: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, pp. 123–134.
Reményi, P. et al. (2023) “Good and Bad migrants in Hungary. The populist story and the reality in Hungarian migration policy”, Problemy Polityki Społecznej Studia i Dyskusje. Vol. 59(4), pp. 323–344. DOI: 10.31971/pps/162003.
Rugh, W.A. (2009) The Case for Soft Power in Seib, P. (ed.) Toward a New Public Diplomacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3–21. DOI: 10.1057/9780230100855_1.
Rutland, P. and Kazantsev, A. (2016) “The limits of Russia’s «soft power»”, Journal of Political Power. Vol. 9(3), pp. 395–413. DOI: 10.1080/2158379X.2016.1232287.
Schlipphak, B. and Treib, O. (2017) “Playing the blame game on Brussels: the domestic political effects of EU interventions against democratic backsliding”, J Eur Public Policy. Vol. 24(3), pp. 352–365. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1229359.
Schmuck, D. and Hameleers, M. (2020) “Closer to the people: A comparative content analysis of populist communication on social networking sites in pre- and post-Election periods”, Inf Commun Soc. Vol. 23(10), pp. 1531–1548. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1588909.
Sevin, E. (2015) “Pathways of connection: An analytical approach to the impacts of public diplomacy”, Public Relat Rev. Vol. 41(4), pp. 562–568. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.07.003.
Simon-Nagy, L. (2012) Nyilvános diplomácia [Public Diplomacy]. Budapest: Corvinus University of Budapest.
Surowiec, P. and Miles, C. (2021) “The populist style and public diplomacy: kayfabe as performative agonism in Trump’s Twitter posts”, Public Relations Inquiry. Vol. 10, pp. 5–30. DOI: 10.1177/2046147X20979294.
Szőke, A. (2022) “From the material to the emotional?”, Intersections. Vol. 8(3), pp. 48–65. DOI: 10.17356/ieejsp.v8i3.877.
Tarrósy, I. and Vörös, Z. (2014) “Hungary’s global opening to an interpolar world”, Politeja. Vol. 11(2), pp. 139–162. DOI: 10.12797/Politeja.11.2014.28.06.
Toth, T. (2020) “Target the enemy: explicit and implicit populism in the rhetoric of the Hungarian right”, Journal of Contemporary European Studies. Vol. 28(3), pp. 366–386. DOI: 10.1080/14782804.2020.1757415.
Verbeek, B. and Zaslove, A. (2017) Populism and Foreign Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.15.
Visnovitz, P. and Jenne, E.K. (2021) “Populist argumentation in foreign policy: the case of Hungary under Viktor Orbán, 2010–2020”, Comparative European Politics. Vol. 19, pp. 683–702. DOI: 10.1057/s41295-021-00256-3.
Zappone, T. (2023) “Reinventing Soft Power: The Strong Impact of China’s Soft Power «Shortcomings» on the Global South”, IAI Papers, Vol. 23, pp. 2–17.
Yablokov, I. (2015) “Conspiracy Theories as a Russian Public Diplomacy Tool: The Case of Russia Today (RT)”, Politics. Vol. 35(3–4), pp. 301–315. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9256.12097.
DOI: 10.33067/SE.2.2024.7
Language: English
Pages: 135-155
How to Cite:
Harvard
Kacziba, P. (2024) "Applying Negative Soft Power? Examining Hungary’s Digital Criticism of the European Union". Studia Europejskie – Studies in European Affairs, 2/2024, pp. 135-155. DOI: 10.33067/SE.2.2024.7